I don't understand what the functional difference is between "virus" and "malware". For example, if someone is using an antivirus product and gets a viral infection on their machine, they will probably run to Malwarebytes (MBAM) because most antivirus systems are poorly suited to removing an infection once it gets onto the machine.
I have found AVG to be one exception to that.
Also, Kaspersky includes a Virus Removal Tool (which I found after I deleted Kaspersky Pure 3.0 in favor of Webroot, because Kasp was too aggressive).
At the same time, Malwarebytes goes around giving away the free version which is a scan-on-demand anti-malware product that, somehow, definitely does remove virus infections that slipped past the antivirus. However, no one that I know would ever suggest that it's a good idea to buy the full "pro" version of Malwarebytes because (a) it is not a good enough antivirus to do the job of one and (b) any good antivirus would clash with Malwarebytes pro.
If this is true, then why is it never a problem to scan on demand with MBAM regardless of your antivirus?
If someone could please explain the real difference between "virus" and "malware" I think I could figure out the rest of the puzzle.
Thank you!
Is Webroot an antivirus or an anti-malware product?
Login to the community
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.