Skip to main content
Solved

Webreputation with Firefox and Google


Did this help you find an answer to your question?
Show first post

31 replies

  • Author
  • New Voice
  • 16 replies
  • October 28, 2015
No worries - take your tiem.
 
As I wrote I did find the solution and it workes now with Firefox for me

shorTcircuiT
Gold VIP
  • Gold VIP
  • 7721 replies
  • October 28, 2015
Our replies crossed each other.  See my previous reply above 🙂

  • Author
  • New Voice
  • 16 replies
  • October 28, 2015
Ok - I have uninstalled the old Webroot Web Reputation toolbar.
 
Originally the issue was that in the Google search results only on the first page of the result list the Webroot Reputation was shown - Triplehelix in the 2nd post showed the issue very nicely.
 
But as I wrote I found the solution in the Google search options and now the reputation is shown even if you skip to the next Google search results
 
Peter

shorTcircuiT
Gold VIP
  • Gold VIP
  • 7721 replies
  • October 28, 2015
That was my turn to misunderstand 🙂  I see what you mean now.  I am not able to give a verification that it works at the moment, but hopefully another user will!

  • Retired Webrooter
  • 95 replies
  • October 28, 2015
@ wrote:
Ok - I have uninstalled the old Webroot Web Reputation toolbar.
 
Originally the issue was that in the Google search results only on the first page of the result list the Webroot Reputation was shown - Triplehelix in the 2nd post showed the issue very nicely.
 
But as I wrote I found the solution in the Google search options and now the reputation is shown even if you skip to the next Google search results
 
Peter
@: the original problem you described was caused by a change of the page structure of the google search result, which caused our extension to now longer retrieve URLs to look them up.
Changing the settings in Google is a workaround, but a fix will be available with the next version of our plugins.
Best,
foo

  • Author
  • New Voice
  • 16 replies
  • October 28, 2015
Hi foo,
 
great - thanks for the response.
 Peter

Reply